Insanity is the exact repetition of the same action, over and over again, in the hope of change.
Estimated reading time: 2 minutes. A link to the article will be sent to you by email:
Einstein owns a brilliant phrase:
“Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results is insanity.”
I see this kind of madness all the time. Many people know that I practice an alternative (natural) approach to the treatment of oncology. I often hear stories from my patients about how oncologists treat them, so much so that Dr. Mengele himself could be embarrassed and consider himself an innocent, modest person. I have had cases where a patient had her entire large intestine removed in 7 operations over 5 years, cutting out the tumor that appeared again and again. At the same time, doctors also cut her liver 5 times due to metastasis. Preparing for the next operation, the poor woman decided that she could not stand it anymore. In another case that I remember, a 9-year-old boy had half of his facial skull cut out in 4 operations and was prepared for a new one, hoping that this time the tumor would not return. Oncologists, starting chemotherapy once again, cannot help but know that chemotherapy kills the body faster than a tumor. Today it is believed that the vast majority of cancer patients will die not from cancer, but from complications of treatment: direct and indirect.
Let's say the patient himself does not understand this. He has only one example - himself. However, traditional oncologists have been doing the same thing for years and with hundreds of people. They are losing patients due to chemotherapy, either directly on the needle or as a result of complications from it. There are virtually no cures for stage 3 and 4 cancers, but they continue to kill patients with their treatments.
* Josef Mengele is a German doctor who conducted medical experiments on prisoners of the Auschwitz concentration camp during World War II. Mengele was personally involved in the selection of prisoners arriving at the camp and conducted criminal experiments on prisoners. Tens of thousands of people became its victims.
Author:
Boris Grinblat
Materials on the topic
- “Cut, poison, burn” - traditional oncological methods (Chapter 7 of Boris Greenblat’s book “Diagnosis of cancer: to be treated or to live? An alternative view of oncology”)
- An integrated approach to cancer treatment
- The diagnosis is cancer. What to do?
- The truth about cancer. Search for treatment methods. All films of the project
- Necessary conditions for natural cancer treatment to be effective. Boris Grinblat
- Key success factors for natural cancer treatment. Boris Grinblat
- The diagnosis is cancer. What to do? Boris Greenblat at a conference in Voronezh
- An integrated approach to alternative cancer treatment. Video masterclass by Boris Greenblat
- All speeches by Boris Greenblat
We recommend reading our book:
Diagnosis of cancer: to be treated or to live? An alternative view of oncology To quickly get into the topic of alternative medicine, as well as find out the whole truth about cancer and traditional oncology, we recommend reading the book “Diagnosis of Cancer: Treat or Live” for free on our website.
An alternative view of oncology" Read for free
We spread truth and knowledge. If you find our work useful and are ready to provide financial assistance, then you can transfer any amount feasible for you. This will help spread truthful information about cancer and other diseases and could save lives. Participate in this important matter of helping people! Support the project
Madness as a system
Amid cries of “We need to change the system!” Liberals not only do not change it, but from Maidan to Maidan they are weeding out everyone who really wants to change it.
“Madness is the exact repetition of the same action.
Time after time, in the hope of change.”
Albert Einstein
Ukraine has long been watched, like fish in an aquarium, by both the West and the East. They add food and knock on the glass. They observe how predatory fish eat herbivores, some take naturalistic notes.
Just recently, the Western publication Foreign Policy wrote about another “epiphany”: “The only way to defeat the kleptocracy that has taken root in Ukraine, which is hindering the normal development of the economy, is to change legal norms, since lawlessness can only be defeated by establishing the rule of law. This is exactly what the protesters who took to the streets of Kyiv in 2013 demanded.”
The naivety of Western experts is as striking as the naivety of some of the first wave of Maidans (the other waves are just a bunch of sheep, excuse my French). So, they, like those naive Maidans, had no idea that Ukraine had the most advanced legislation both on corruption and on regulating other legal issues. There were legally independent courts, legally protected from outside influence, in the security forces there was a whole cascade of mutual inspection services and internal security services, there was one of the most advanced Constitutions and a balanced Criminal Code.
But none of this worked as it should then, and now it has completely ceased to exist. That then a completely legally independent judge, protected on all sides, took the lead when a call came from above, and his conscience was measured by the amount of cut paper with watermarks, that now everything is the same, plus the factor of baseball bats, which the “ahtivists” use to climb into Europe , can force the right decision out of the judge. The cascade of internal security agencies has ceased to exist at all, now it is just an apparatus of violence, which, for loyalty and fulfillment of the whims of the regime, is allowed to do what it did before, that is, take according to rank, crush the unwanted and release the necessary from responsibility. Now, without damaging the existence of the Constitution, most of the articles can be deleted, and from the Criminal Code one can be left altogether - “for separatism”, everything will remain unchanged.
We can copy Dutch legislation and allow soft drugs, or US legislation and introduce the electric chair and sentences of 324 years in prison. The result will be the same. For the question is in the system and geopolitics, I would even say in historical geopolitics, that is, politics tied not only to geographical location, but also to history.
Liberals also repeat the thesis that the system needs to be changed. But only after the word “system” do they usually fall silent. Because there are very few existing political systems - feudalism, capitalism, fascism, socialism. Liberals, to one degree or another, are satisfied with all the first three, but they are still shy about feudalism and fascism, and do not accept socialism in any form.
So they go out onto the Maidans to exchange capitalism for capitalism and expect the opposite results.
Albert Einstein commented best on the state of today's Ukraine, and indeed the entire post-Soviet society: “Madness is the exact repetition of the same action. Over and over again, in the hope of change. This is madness."
Amid cries of “We need to change the system!” Liberals not only do not change it, but from Maidan to Maidan they weed out everyone who really wants to change it. As a result, we see the degradation of power from a smart thief to a foolish thief, from a fool to a madman.
In the West, a system is understood exclusively as a set of laws and rules. After all, in their opinion, the law is everything, man is a slave of the law. With us, a person is a slave of the person whom he has chosen as his slave owner, and this person is restrained solely by the system of political and economic relations. To abolish this discrepancy with the so-called “civilized society”, it is necessary to send everyone who wants it in a time machine a thousand years ago, place them in another geographical zone, preferably in Europe during the times of the barbarians, and from there they can try to build a new Ukrainian statehood somewhere in Rome . There are no other options to build Ukrainian capitalism of the European type.
There is another option - choose another system, for example socialism. The main goal - self-enrichment - is changing to building a developed state - the key to personal prosperity. Nationalism in this system is automatically replaced by patriotism. And the person who will take the helm will no longer need to enrich himself or his environment, so that it does not interfere with the enrichment of those who enrich themselves at the expense of the rest of the population. And then he won’t have to start a “fire in the warehouse,” as befits a huckster, in order to hide the thefts. Which, in fact, is what happened in Ukraine.
But it is precisely this option that the Liberals are afraid of, both those who have already accumulated fat over the years of theft, which they hypocritically call “business,” and the huge team of small Liberals who are on their “suck.”
Ukraine, having never created a “pivot” idea, simply became a visual aid of what will happen to all Russians, regardless of whether they renounced their Russianness or not.
The West frankly does not understand this, in their historical confidence that their system, like our periodic table, works for everyone. They have not read Ukrainian legislation and the Constitution, so they probably think that if murderers are released here and people with a different opinion are killed, then this is solely the fault of gaps in the law.
The fault lies in the system of mutual theft, the laws of which work as long as there is something to steal. While the beggars and the poor are being robbed, the system is stable (there are many poor people, they won’t even notice a little bit of what has been stolen), the system begins to rock when they start to rob the middle ones, and a war begins, when thieves, due to the lack of objects of robbery, begin to steal from each other, at the same time eating bones "beggars" and meat of the "averages". And then the entire Liberian system goes to hell, but even the dying Liberian, crushed under the rubble of the tower he built, with the last of his strength shouts “we need to change the system!”, adding with his dying lips “only to the capitalist one.”
Vitaly SVOBODIN
Source
Do you know what madness is? Iconic video game quotes
Be careful, there may be spoilers.
Video game characters have given the world many catchphrases, remarks and monologues, which have been stolen into quotes and jokes. And sometimes one good line can succinctly explain the whole meaning of what is happening in the game. In this collection we will talk about some of them.
Witcher III Wild Hunt
“Move, Roach!”
Photo: © CD PROJEKT SA
Throughout his adventures, the witcher Geralt changed more than one horse and each, regardless of gender, became a Roach. Geralt calls his horse with a whistle, and it instantly appears next to him, even if it remains in another city. And when sitting in the saddle, the witcher always says: “Move, Roach!”
Watch on YouTube
Teleportations from one location to another and the gray-headed witcher’s love for the name Roach gave rise to a bunch of funny pictures with this quote among fans.
Hotline Miami
“Do you like hurting others?”
As the story progresses, a mysterious man in a rooster mask named Richard comes to the heroes in dreams or delirium and, at first glance, talks incoherent nonsense. In fact, Richard's speeches are directly related to the plot.
Watch on YouTube
In one of his monologues, the rooster asks: “Do you like hurting people?” Due to the overall atmosphere of the game and Richard's charismatic mystique, the quote joined the list of catchphrases from Hotline Miami that players remember years after its release.
Metal Gear Solid
"Snake! Snake? Snaaaaaaake!”
In the spy action film from Hideo Kojima, the main character communicates with his assistant via walkie-talkie. If a character dies, then on the end-of-game screen, an ally on the radio very emotionally shouts his name.
Watch on YouTube
The players liked his intonation so much that they began to make various funny videos with this cry.
Mafia: The City of Lost Heaven
Monologue by Thomas Angelo
The first "Mafia" is inspired by the legendary gangster films "The Godfather" and "Goodfellas". The project from the 2K Czech studio gives players colorful, memorable characters, an interesting story and well-written dialogues.
Watch on YouTube
The final speech of the protagonist, Thomas Angelo, is especially memorable: “You know, I think that in everything you need to know when to stop. Yes, measure, that's a good word. Anyone who wants too much risks losing absolutely everything. True, those who want too little from life may get nothing at all...” It beautifully sums up the entire path the character has traveled.
Far Cry 3
“Have I already told you what insanity is?”
The villain of the third part of Far Cry turned out to be very charismatic and immediately fell in love with the players. In one scene, Vaas Montenegro talks with the bound main character, talking in his signature manner about madness.
https://www.instagram.com/p/CAg5HjLlSHi/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link
“Have I already told you what insanity is? Insanity is the exact repetition of the same action over and over again in the hope of change. This. Eat. Madness". After the game's release, the quote was found all over the Internet and even now it is used as a joke or reference.
Bioshock
"Be kind"
Bioshock is a game with philosophical overtones. In the end, it turns out that the protagonist is the son of another important plot character, Andrew Ryan, a utopian who built the underwater city of Rapture.
Watch on YouTube
The phrase “be kind” controls the hero, depriving him of free will. Ryan's last words convey the main idea of the whole story: "Man chooses, slave obeys."
Fallout
"War. War never changes"
Quote from the introductory video for the Fallout games. It implies that the methods and methods of waging war can change, but not its very essence. War always brings death and destruction.
Watch on YouTube
"War. War never changes" is one of the most famous expressions from video games. It seems to tell the user: even after the nuclear apocalypse, everything remains the same.
Einstein. Madness effect
Some of the characters in this column may spark a debate: genius or not a genius? But there is one person who was recognized as a genius during his lifetime - Albert Einstein.
The born baby caused the mother a lot of anxiety: “The head was so large, the skull was so angular that she even thought about a congenital deformity. The child learned to speak so slowly that his mother almost considered him mentally retarded.” (1)
It is believed that young Einstein suffered from a mild form of autism as a child, and he could be called a “nerd” in modern youth slang. The future genius demonstrated more than average performance at school, but self-study at home progressed by leaps and bounds. From the first days, Albert grew up withdrawn and phlegmatic, but surprisingly independent.
Once, as a teenager, he threw a skittle ball at his sister, another time he almost hit her head with a spatula. Albert swung a chair at the music teacher, causing her to run out of the house and never return to her student. When such an attack took hold of him, “he apparently could not control himself. In his normal state, he was unnaturally calm, almost inhibited... This apparent apathy made his parents worry about his mental health. He started talking late and, until he was seven years old, had the habit of quietly and slowly repeating every phrase he uttered... The reason was, apparently, not only his inability, but also his reluctance to communicate.” (1)
At the age of 12, unexpectedly for his parents, he fell into religious ecstasy, refused to eat pork, sang religious hymns, but after a year everything passed.
At the age of 15, Einstein left school with poor grades and without a diploma, but continued to study on his own. In 1896, on the second attempt, he passed the exams at the Higher Technical School in Zurich. A careless attitude towards studying and open disregard for the opinions of professors came back to haunt Einstein upon graduation. His thesis received only 4.5 points (by modern standards, a “C”), and vindictive teachers refused to recommend him for a job. The wayward scientist had to eke out a living for two years, looking for a job. After spending two months as a freelance school teacher, he got a job as a third-class technical expert in a patent office.
The life of a genius went on as usual, and soon he already needed to support his family, which he started at the age of 22. His wife was a fellow student at the polytechnic, Mileva Maric, an ugly, lame girl who was four years older than Einstein. Mileva also studied physics, which was rare for women at that time, and performed many of the mathematical calculations for Albert. This fact gave rise to the claim that it was Mileva who was the true author of the theory of relativity.
Soon, discord began between the spouses, possibly due to the fact that Mileva baptized the children into the Orthodox faith without her husband’s knowledge. Einstein became infatuated with his cousin Elsa Lowenthal and actually broke off relations with his wife. While Albert Einstein's public life can be considered exemplary, the same cannot be said about his personal life. Incredible passions raged inside the shaggy-haired phlegmatic man. The divorce from Maric was long and painful. As one of the conditions for the dissolution of the marriage, Einstein gave his wife money for the future Nobel Prize, which he expected to receive (another argument in favor of the fact that Mileva was his co-author). And indeed, a few years later I received it.
Not being an exemplary family man, Einstein began to treat his second wife Elsa through the prism of the Oedipus complex - as a desirable mother, but an unwanted partner. The fact is that along with fame, numerous fans came to him. Rich ladies regularly gave Einstein rides in cars and showered him with gifts, driving Elsa into hysterics. By the way, the scientist bequeathed to one of his girlfriends twice as much money as his own son Hans, leaving her all his personal belongings and books.
In his young and mature years, in order to please women, Einstein looked after himself quite carefully, but in his old age he stopped worrying about his appearance. In recent years, he went without underwear, wore the same soiled sweater and wrinkled pants, pulled directly over his naked body. He wore worn-out shoes without socks, rarely washed or had his hair cut, did not brush his teeth, did not shave for a long time and never combed his hair. “He had the air of an artist rather than a scientist” (2). There is another assumption: the scientist paid increased attention to “mythologizing his own image. It is possible that these were purely intuitive or simply unintentional actions, but one way or another they were inherent in him. The excessive growth of a thick head of hair, walking around in wrinkled clothes, a demonstrative reluctance to put on socks, including even in those cases when he went to official meetings, undoubtedly relate to “playing in one’s own image” (3).
The great physicist was an enthusiastic, slightly absent-minded, dreamy person and was distinguished by his unprincipled morality. If it seemed to him that his actions would remain secret, he easily made a deal with his conscience. Therefore, his intimate relationships with women were often too frivolous. After all, almost no one knew about his continuous betrayals. So, only recently it became known that he was having an affair with the young wife of the Soviet sculptor Sergei Konenkov, who worked for the NKVD.
You should pay attention to the peculiarities of speech development (more precisely, underdevelopment) of Albert. “Retrospectively, Einstein himself saw in his slow speech development one of the reasons that facilitated his discovery of the foundations of the theory of relativity: he said that he understood space and time in a new way precisely because he learned to use the words Raum (4) and Zeit (5) only at such a late age, when other young people have been speaking them for a long time, as a rule, without thinking about their meaning, received in ready-made form during language learning” (6).
American psychologist Ion Carlson believes that the presence of the schizophrenia gene is one of the incentives for high creative talent. “According to Carlson, Einstein had this gene, and doctors diagnosed schizophrenia in his son. Consequently, although Einstein was a mentally healthy person, he was a carrier of such a gene, which undoubtedly influenced the mental and spiritual structure of this genius, although it did not cause the disease” (7).
A post-mortem examination of Einstein's brain showed that his parietal lobe was wider than normal by about 15%. It is believed that it is responsible for spatial sensations and analytical thinking (the scientist himself said that he thinks more in images than in concepts). This anomaly can also explain the fact that Albert Einstein allegedly could not speak at all until he was three years old.
So, there are no convincing reasons to talk about schizophrenia: oddities of behavior without delusional disorders mean little, just like a son who fell ill with schizophrenia (the son, abandoned by his father, spent most of his life in psychiatric hospitals). But there is a lot of evidence for the presence of schizoid personality traits in Einstein.
It can be assumed that Einstein's central nervous system (CNS) was damaged in the womb, possibly due to toxicosis during his mother's pregnancy. This is evidenced by the “angular” skull; delayed speech development; some “lethargy” in the “usual state”. Thus, organic damage to the central nervous system, from which psychiatrists primarily expect mental retardation, can be fertile ground for the manifestation of genius!
1. Carter P., Highfield R. Einstein. Private life // Ogonyok No. 43, 1998 2. Zelig K. Albert Einstein. M.: 1964 3. Badrak V. Anthology of genius. Kiev: 2005 4. Space (German) 5. Time (German) 6. Ivanov V.V. The unconscious, functional asymmetry, language and creativity // The unconscious: nature, functions, research methods. Volume 4, 1985 7. Goncharenko N.V. Genius in art and science. M.: 1991
crazy facets of talentbiographypathographyEinstein
